Until recently the study of micro-regions (e.g. Euroregions, the Maputo corridor, growth triangles) and the study of macro-regions (e.g. EU, SADC, ASEAN) have been largely separated discourses. During the last decade it has become evident that micro-regions and macro-regions have become more interlinked and intertwined. The point of departure of this project is that the linkages between micro-regions and macro-regions are both poorly understood and poorly theorised. By better understanding MICMAC linkages, we will be able to learn more, not only about micro-regionalism but also about macro-regionalism. The aim of the project is to explore the linkages between micro-regionalism and macro-regionalism. The project seeks to generate theory as well as provide empirical and policy-relevant insights. A series of micro-regional cases, situated within distinct macro-regions, will be analysed within a comparative framework. From this comparative analysis, it should be possible to extract general conclusions about the MICMAC relationships and, at the same time, evaluate the importance of particular contexts for understanding these relationships. The overall project is conceived in collaboration with Gothenburg University.

Contact persons: Philippe De Lombaerde and Fredrik Söderbaum